User talk:Dan arndt
|
It is approximately 7:28 AM where this user lives (Perth, Western Australia). [] |
 | Every time you read an article on Wikipedia, remember that the only reason it exists is because someone gave enough of a damn and two thoughts about what you care about to put it there. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome!
Hello, Dan arndt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your unnecessary contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay till I get angry and chase you away. Here are some pages that you might find NOT helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RichMac 07:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Dan,
This is the third instance I've found of you today draftifying an article with the Draft:Draft: prefix. This can happen if you try to draftify an article and there is already an existing draft. Please check the page title when this happens. You can delete the draft page if it is just a redirect to the main space version you are moving or you can also title it "Draft"Title 2" instead. Thank you for all of your contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Re: Draft:MF 88[edit]
Moving a 2006 article to draft space seems bizarre - Yes, that article is 18 years old (the template says 'recent'). But I'd prefer to hear what made you made the move and the thresholds you are looking out for the article to be improved from the views of an AfC reviewer (I know it lacks sources, but how many would you prefer to see). Are there any kind of specific information, suggestions or sources would you like to see or added? The French version fr:MF 88 is relatively well written so a lot can be borrowed/translated from that, I think if translated properly there may be enough content to bring it up to DYK standards. - Mailer Diablo 20:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect, thank you! I will put that in my to-do list. - Mailer Diablo 01:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Draftification of my articles[edit]
Why would you draftify my two articles Roman Building and A History of Western Architecture within two hours of their creation? The little information as it stood would have been useful (and uncontroversial) as it stood to viewers, and the reviews cited established notability. It seems that the articles were draftified solely because I had not yet created inline references to the reviews. Air on White (talk) 00:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Draft of Monica Ten Kate / Monica the Medium[edit]
hello! You drafted my article; I finished and I added the necessary sources to my article about Monica Ten Kate. Is it possible for you to review the draft and approve it/publish it? KobeTheSpiritGuide (talk) 22:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Draftifying redirects[edit]
It doesn't make any sense to mass draftfy soft redirects because there's nothing to improve in redirects. They aren't on mainspace. If you disagree with them, please start a WP:RfC. Also @CycloneYoris and Vanderwaalforces: since you reviewed some redirects, can you take a look at these?
And if you don't know what are WP:SRD, take a look at there. I'm going to dedraftify, because I'm an autoconfirmed user. --MikutoH talk! 16:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)