User:Doug Weller
|
|
IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
Administrative action review (1 thread) Most recent:
|
---|
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread) Most recent:
|
---|
Bots noticeboard (3 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (5 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Original research noticeboard (10 threads) |
---|
External links noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Dispute resolution noticeboard (3 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Media copyright questions (10 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (proposals) (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (6 threads) |
---|
|}
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- 203.37.239.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 58.96.58.49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 67.198.37.16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 33 five times in the last 5 minutes (Talk page blanking by unregistered/new user, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- – Tripped filter 33 five times in the last 5 minutes (Talk page blanking by unregistered/new user, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- – Tripped filter 33 five times in the last 5 minutes (Talk page blanking by unregistered/new user, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- Marvell29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:6c40:1500:462::1000 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:6C40:1500:462:0:0:0:1000 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - 666 (number) was changed by 2600:6C40:1500:462:0:0:0:1000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954461 on 2024-05-17T04:37:33+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 04:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 35.139.66.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 35.139.66.76 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 04:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 115.70.205.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 83.110.206.40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2405:201:a007:f06d:699:eb5b:2f30:611d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:60da:5000:9d99:69cc:87cc:8e7a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- KindHorta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Level 4048 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. LTA. See also Level 6072 (talk · contribs)}. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 139.130.43.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Ancient Greek architecture (diff): vandalism after final warning. Mia Mahey (talk) 04:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ramonkey27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism-only account. Every edit is to slightly change the results of sporting events. Continued after final warning. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Marvell29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Podcast and Chill with MacG (diff): vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Mia Mahey (talk) 04:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- HeinreichGaming (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On User:HeinreichGaming: Antisemitic userpage. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Matthew24kyle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On User:Aeontamaraw: vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Borderline whether the user is "vandalism-only" but the vast majority of contributions are problematic, such as creating derogatory user pages for other users and heavily editing (by "archiving" 60,000 bytes) the user pages of other users after previous warnings. Many many warnings at all levels have been archived by this user and a previous block imposed. I don't see another way to stop the disruptive editing. I warned this user for creating User:222.127.189.185 (content was an inaccurate block message), and after warning they created User:Aeontamaraw along similar lines. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 5.195.47.110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. This IP editor has continued disrupting Wikipedia even after several warnings. It now ranges to adding purely incoherent uncited words to articles. Has been blocked on September 2023, and have continued till date. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2405:201:A007:F06D:699:EB5B:2F30:611D (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Making death threats in Indian. SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 06:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 74.49.143.204 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – User has a long history of vandalism. poketape (talk) 07:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 31.61.162.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On :Dź (diff): vandalism after final warning. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agilitz Technologies (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 07:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- ~editor-of-editsandeiting (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Abkazia&SouthOssetia&Artsakh (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Lemonvrofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yeetmasterlololȓ (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "l+o+l+o+l+" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- NewUserNameUserNameNew (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- NotThoseSchoolAnswers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- GOBBY Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Fan de Abundio Martinez (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Fijapak1234 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used 1 instead of i attempting to skip filter: paki. Violating string: fijapaki234" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Hores Stit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) violation of WP:DISRUPTNAME Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you reading that as "Whore's tit", Nick Moyes? It doesn't bother me, but perhaps others might find that unconducive to collaborative editing? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers It was one way of interpreting it (like the hashtag for Susan Boyle's launch event some years ago that caused amusement.) But their 14 genuine edits over 4 years made me not worry about it too much at this time. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you reading that as "Whore's tit", Nick Moyes? It doesn't bother me, but perhaps others might find that unconducive to collaborative editing? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Bestmanpiriya (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Cahk (talk) 07:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Nick Moyes (talk) 08:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agilitz Technologies (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Cahk (talk) 07:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Jaaducando (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Cahk (talk) 07:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Aditi Rao Hydari
Reason: Multiple IPs + a new account changing the DoB, without sources, contrary to the sourced DoB Arjayay (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Arjayay: The reference is a mystery and the old discussions on talk are inconclusive. Perhaps it would be better to remove the birth date? At least there should be a new discussion on talk to spell out how the date is known and why the conflicting sources should be ignored. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Olympiacos F.C.
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 22:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question: @Lorry Gundersen: Can you please point out specific recent edits that are vandalism and briefly explain why they are vandalism? And which ones are from autoconfirmed editors? Large portions of the article are unsourced so it is difficult to tell. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Other administrators: please feel free to resolve this as you see fit based on the response, especially if I take too long to respond. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Trolling. Dronebogus (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've seen far worse on other talk pages. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Battle of Amritsar (1757)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Noorullah (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Mewing (orthotropics)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Target for people uploading their own photos for the meme factor. Popular vandalism target. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Reactions to the Russian invasion of Ukraine
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Sanctioned topic - WP:RUSUKR. – Primium (talk) 04:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Sandhu
Reason: Recently some unregistered user adding unsourced material without providing any proper sources witgout any reason so its request to increase the protection level of this particular article Truthfindervert (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Tirant lo Blanch
Reason: Edit warring. Agpshi (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Draft:Lifespan Integration
Reason: Full creation protection seems unjustified. The corresponding mainspace page is unprotected and no one has recreated it. I personally do not intend to create an article on this topic but in case an autoconfirmed editor does, it would be reasonable to drop the SALT level to semi to match mainspace. Protecting admin has been desysoped so I brought it here directly. Nickps (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Nickps: The SALT does seem justifiable, given three speedy deletions. I do agree with you that full-protection is unnecessary for it, however. Semi-protection would seem to me to be too low; maybe XCP? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even that sounds wrong to me to be honest. Protecting the draft but not the mainspace article is a weird thing to do. It's essentially directing any spam to mainspace. Since there has been no such spam all this time, I'd argue that the protection has outlived its purpose. But, lowering the protection would still be a positive in any case so I won't get too hung up on the level. Do XCP if you think it's right. Nickps (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like there's been any attempt to re-create the mainspace page after the AfD (which, I should note, post-dates the most recent draft deletion). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even that sounds wrong to me to be honest. Protecting the draft but not the mainspace article is a weird thing to do. It's essentially directing any spam to mainspace. Since there has been no such spam all this time, I'd argue that the protection has outlived its purpose. But, lowering the protection would still be a positive in any case so I won't get too hung up on the level. Do XCP if you think it's right. Nickps (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Ángel Hernández (umpire)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – already protected, but long protection log due to being controversial umpire. Will120 (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- You sure you're in the right section? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined The last edit was on 23 April 2024 and semi-protection expires on 7 July 2024. Nothing more is needed at the moment. Johnuniq (talk) 06:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Israel–Hamas war
Change "Since the start of the Israeli operation, more than 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 15,000 children and 10,000 women.[87][88]" to "Since the start of the Israeli operation, nearly 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 7,000 children and nearly 5,000 women.[87][88]." This is based on the data recently revised by the UN, accessible here: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities-gaza-strip-and-israel-reported-impact-day-215. ConDissenter (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is there another place to request this change? The talk page for Israel-Hamas war is restricted as well. The current source for casualty data is palinfo.com, which describes itself by saying it "does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people." https://english.palinfo.com/about-us/. Recognizing that reliable sources do not need to have a neutral POV, why should we use this as a source rather than a less biased source like the United Nations? ConDissenter (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Example Article Name
I would like to request one civilian employee of the israeli defence ministry was killed and two injured in action in gaza and should be added to israeli casualties, separate new category from IDF. See link
2605:B100:D20:FD72:0:3:45F:C701 (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm assuming this was meant for Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (7 May 2024 – present)? If so, looks to have already been done. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 05:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Israel–Hamas war
The death toll statistics are presented in an imbalanced way. Include the israeli statistics for the palestinian casualties. Egaga1 (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC) |
6 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
AutopatrolledUser:Princess of Ara
I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC) User:Prince of Erebor
I have created 78 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor(The Book of Mazarbul) 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC) User:SheriffIsInTown
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC) User:MinorProphet
Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) User:Eagledj
I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) User:Twinkle1990
Created over 60 articles and those never got deleted. Surprised to know why being denied. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
User:GatewayPolitics
Hey, I'm requesting Autopatrolled because I mainly make election maps and correct election maps. For a while now, I have been requesting individual files so I can override them with updated data or shape the maps. I'm very experienced in making maps and always make sure I have correct information. Would I be able to have Autopatrolled? Thank you GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser
User:Dominic3203
I just want to have a method to edit Wikipedia efficiently and swiftly. Dominic3203 (talk) 04:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Closed Limelike Curves
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
ConfirmedUser:Grammar crackers
According to what I've read, after 221 edits and an account that's 3 months old, I should have already been autoconfirmed. I believe that it's possible that I actually was autoconfirmed before, but that it disappeared after my account name change (it had been requested of me that I change my account name because I was told that it sounded like a company name). May I please be confirmed to correct this error? Grammar crackers (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Grammar crackers (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed |
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewerUser:Florificapis
I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [2]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again. I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:InDimensional
I would like to participate in the NPP backlog drive.
User:TarnishedPath
I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Trainsskyscrapers
Hello. I was initially given a month long trial as a new page reviewer after receiving an invitation on my user page, and I've been enjoying everything so far: reviewing pages, providing feedback, sending WikiLove to new and returning users who have made exceptional first attempts, tagging issues, and resolving issues myself (that could otherwise be tagged) when I have time in an attempt to reduce the backlog. I have already been renewed once, and my second trial expires in a little over two weeks (May 26th). I'm requesting either an indefinite or longer-term ability to review new pages before my time lapses. Haven't had any behavioral issues, and I try to treat all users with respect. I will continue to help clear the backlog in the meantime. Thanks again. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Ixtal
Forgot to re-apply before the permission ran out. Would like to continue participating in the drive as well as afterwards. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Aszx5000
I was turned down last July 2023 as being too early. I have since increased my article (incl. BLP) creation, and have done major overhaul and expansions of important topic articles here. I remain autopatrolled on Wikipedia and WikiCommons, continue to participate in AfD, and have done some PRODS. Am willing to learn the NPP process. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC) User:Rahammz
Hello. I had the new page reviewer permission but for some reason it was taken away without any explanation. I would like to apply for it again or at least get the reasoning for the removal of my permission Rahammz (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:The Sharpest Lives
I noticed there is a backlog at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, so I'd be happy to help! The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 16:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) User:Pbritti
Hi! I was granted a one month trial with the NPP right and feel as though I did a decent job. I mainly focused on marking obviously acceptable articles. I didn't do a ton of reviewing, but I then again I felt like doing more than a handful a day would have been overstepping the constraints of a trial permission. If it is ok with the coordinating admins, I'd like to keep using the NPP right; feel welcome to simply renew the trial period for another month if you need more indication that I'll stick to procedure. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Xoak
I was suggested to apply here, and I've decided to volunteer. To make this more consistent: X (talk) 04:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover
User:ToadetteEdit
Reason for requesting page mover rights: multiple reasons including to swap pages (as a result of RM discussions) and suppress redirects, especially R2 eligible. I understood that I won't abuse this privileged right and read the instructions. ToadetteEdit! 15:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC) User:SafariScribe
Hi, I request to volunteer in moving pages with the extended right. I usually draftify pages and instead if automatically deleting them, it is being marked for CSD, another increase to the backlog. Following my involvement with early page moving, I was advised to get the page mover right by Liz, and now, I also saw it can be granted at the discretion of the admin. Also, while moving pages, I at times submit technical request if a closed move request—something I can do with page mover right. This is a volunteer work I have decided to take and thanks for you consideration. I also promise not to misuse the right Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Cremastra
Re-requesting after my one-month trial expired a month ago. I rename pages when it's necessary to make a round-robin swap, draftify new articles, and periodically close RMs. I also sometimes help in renaming categories for CfD. Cremastra (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) User:TornadoLGS
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewerUser:RowanJ LP
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC) User:RITWIK MAHATA
I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) User:Imsaneikigai
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC) User:AnAlpineSymphony
I have read all the articles and tips for reviewing pending edits. I also have a large, significant history of editing many Engkish and Korean articles about Academics, Music theory, etc. AnAlpineSymphony (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC) User:BerryForPerpetuity
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I commonly do anti-vandalism work with recent changes patrolling, and I have familiarized myself with the criteria. BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 13:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC) User:AlphaBetaGamma
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
RollbackUser:Piscili
Have been patrolling Recent Changes and fighting vandalism for some time now and I think that having one or more advanced anti vandalism tools would help a lot in this trajectory. Piscili (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Cowboygilbert
Finally being bold enough to request. Most of my edits come anti-vandalism, I have over 1000 mainspace edits, and know policies to be able to detect the difference between vandalism, disruptive editing, and test edits. I also actively use RedWarn and Twinkle to help with a faster warning system and to help the undo process.Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 13:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:GrayStorm
I want rollback so that I can revert vandalism more efficiently and use more anti vandalism tools. I was granted this right for 3 months by Red-tailed hawk, and I am now here to request it permanently, in accordance with the request. GrayStorm(talk to me|look at what i do) 04:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editorUser:Snowmanonahoe
|
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
)
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
Barnstars
|
- Members of the Fifteen Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedia administrators
- Wikipedians in Florida
- Wikipedians in Miami
- Wikipedians in the United Kingdom
- British Wikipedians
- Wikipedia checkusers
- Wikipedia oversighters
- Wikipedians who use Discord
- Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week
- WikiProject Archaeology participants
- Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team members
- Wikipedians by alma mater: Yale University
- Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests
- Wikipedians with MS degrees
- Wikipedians who have access to Project MUSE
- Members of the Ten Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedians by alma mater: London School of Economics